Research progress on the effect of mechanical force stimulation on bone metabolism

doi:10.12439/kqhm.1005-4979.2024.05.010

Abstract

Abstract:

The impact of mechanical force stimulation on bone metabolism is currently garnering significant scholarly interest. As scientific inquiry progresses, the focus of these studies has increasingly shifted towards a more granular level of analysis. Recent years, researchers are now examining this phenomenon from various perspectives, including the influence of differing mechanical properties, force magnitudes, frequencies, cell types, and underlying molecular mechanisms on bone metabolism.Given the intricate nature of this process, this article seeks to provide a comprehensive overview of the advancements in research pertaining to the modulation of bone metabolism through the alteration of mechanical stimuli or the targeting of specific cell types and receptors, in order to provide a reference for further research.

Key words:

mechanical force, bone metabolism, osteogenesis

摘要：

机械力刺激对骨代谢的影响受到学者们的广泛关注。随着科学研究的深入，研究的焦点逐渐转向更为细化的层面。学者们试图从多个角度探讨这一问题，包括不同力学性质、力学强度、力的频率、细胞类型及分子机制对骨代谢的影响。近年来研究热点集中于如何通过改变机械力刺激或者针对特定细胞类型及某种感受器来调整骨代谢水平。鉴于这一过程的复杂性，本文旨在综述机械力刺激对骨代谢影响的相关最新研究进展，以期为进一步研究提供参考。

关键词:

机械力, 骨代谢, 成骨

CLC Number:

R782

JIANG Xue, WANG Zuolin.

Research progress on the effect of mechanical force stimulation on bone metabolism

[J]. 《Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery》, 2024, 34(5): 393-396.

姜雪, 王佐林.

机械力刺激对骨代谢影响的研究进展

[J]. 《口腔颌面外科杂志》, 2024, 34(5): 393-396.

/ / Recommend / Download Citations

URL: https://journal06.magtech.org.cn/Jweb_joms/EN/10.12439/kqhm.1005-4979.2024.05.010

https://journal06.magtech.org.cn/Jweb_joms/EN/Y2024/V34/I5/393

References

[1] 宋志靖, 王薇, 宋敏, 等. MC3T3-E1 细胞在不同机械应力刺激下成骨表达机制的研究进展 [J]. 中国骨质疏松杂志, 2021, 27(2): 289-292, 307.

[2] Yang SD, Wang N, Ma YT, et al. Immunomodulatory effects and mechanisms of distraction osteogenesis[J]. Int J Oral Sci, 2022, 14(1): 4.

[3] Ishikawa S, Kim Y, Kang M, et al. Effects of weight-bearing exercise on bone health in girls: A meta-analysis[J]. Sports Med, 2013, 43(9): 875-892.

[4] Schurman CA, Verbruggen SW, Alliston T. Disrupted osteocyte connectivity and pericellular fluid flow in bone with aging and defective TGF-β signaling[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2021, 118(25): e2023999118.

[5] Morris FL, Smith RM, Payne WR, et al. Compressive and shear force generated in the lumbar spine of female rowers[J]. Int J Sports Med, 2000, 21(7): 518-523.

[6] Zhou Y, Guo P, Jin ZY, et al. Fluid shear force and hydrostatic pressure jointly promote osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs by activating YAP1 and NFAT2[J]. Biotechnol J, 2024, 19(4): e2300714.

[7] Cai KZ, Jiao YL, Quan Q, et al. Improved activity of MC3T3-E1 cells by the exciting piezoelectric BaTiO3/TC4 using low-intensity pulsed ultrasound[J]. Bioact Mater, 2021, 6(11): 4073-4082.

[8] Jia XL, Su H, Chen XL, et al. A critical role of the KCa 3.1 channel in mechanical stretch-induced proliferation of rat bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells[J]. J Cell Mol Med, 2020, 24(6): 3739-3744.

[9] Wei X, Peng G, Zheng S, et al. Differentiation of umbilicalcord mesenchymal stem cells into steroidogenic cells in comparison to bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells[J]. Cell Prolif, 2012, 45(2): 101-110.

[10] Sen BE, Xie ZH, Case N, et al. Mechanical strain inhibits adipogenesis in mesenchymal stem cells by stimulating a durable beta-catenin signal[J]. Endocrinology, 2008, 149(12): 6065-6075.

[11] Lian JB, Stein GS. Development of the osteoblast phenotype: Molecular mechanisms mediating osteoblast growth and differentiation[J]. Iowa Orthop J, 1995, 15: 118-140.

[12] Bhatt KA, Chang EI, Warren SM, et al. Uniaxial mechanical strain: An in vitro correlate to distraction osteogenesis[J]. 2007, 143(2): 329-336.

[13] Mitsui N, Suzuki N, Maeno M, et al. Optimal compressive force induces bone formation via increasing bone morphogenetic proteins production and decreasing their antagonists production by Saos-2 cells[J]. Life Sci, 2006, 78(23): 2697-2706.

[14] Yao ZL, Chen PY, Fan LY, et al. CCL2 is a critical mechano-responsive mediator in crosstalk between osteoblasts and bone mesenchymal stromal cells[J]. FASEB J, 2021, 35(10): e21851.

[15] Ishihara Y, Sugawara Y, Kamioka H, et al. Ex vivo realtime observation of Ca(2+) signaling in living bone in response to shear stress applied on the bone surface[J]. Bone, 2013, 53(1): 204-215.

[16] Zhao DZ, Riquelme MA, Guda T, et al. Connexin hemichannels with prostaglandin release in anabolic function of bone to mechanical loading[J]. eLife, 2022, 11: e74365.

[17] Deng RX, Li CW, Wang X, et al. Periosteal CD68+F4/80+ macrophages are mechanosensitive for cortical bone formation by secretion and activation of TGF-β1[J]. Adv Sci, 2022, 9(3): e2103343.

[18] Wang LJ, You XL, Lotinun S, et al. Mechanical sensing protein PIEZO1 regulates bone homeostasis via osteoblastosteoclast crosstalk[J]. Nat Commun, 2020, 11(1): 282.

[19] Lyons JS, Joca HC, Law RA, et al. Microtubules tune mechanotransduction through NOX2 and TRPV4 to decrease sclerostin abundance in osteocytes[J]. Sci Signal, 2017, 10(506): eaan5748.

[20] Moore ER, Zhu YX, Ryu HS, et al. Periosteal progenitors contribute to load-induced bone formation in adult mice and require primary Cilia to sense mechanical stimulation[J]. Stem Cell Res Ther, 2018, 9(1): 190.

[21] Zouani OF, Kalisky J, Ibarboure E, et al. Effect of BMP-2 from matrices of different stiffnesses for the modulation of stem cell fate[J]. Biomaterials, 2013, 34(9): 2157-2166.

[22] Uzer G, Bas G, Sen BE, et al. Sun-mediated mechanical LINC between nucleus and cytoskeleton regulates βcatenin nuclear access[J]. J Biomech, 2018, 74: 32-40.

[23] Kegelman CD, Mason DE, Dawahare JH, et al. Skeletal cell YAP and TAZ combinatorially promote bone development[J]. FASEB J, 2018, 32(5): 2706-2721.

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export