Minimally Invasive Technique in Odontectomy of Low Level Impacted Wisdom Teeth of the Mandible

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-4979.2017.06.006

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate and discuss the clinical value of minimally invasive technique in removal of low level impacted wisdom teeth of the mandible. Methods: From June 2013-March 2016, 100 patients were randomly selected. Odontectomy performed with minimally invasive technique (trial group, n=50), odontectomy performed with conventional bone-excision, tooth -section technique (control group, n=50), the results were compared and analyzed. Results: The operation time length and postoperative recovery time in control group were (27.86±11.2) min, and (15.3±3.7) d respectively, they were significantly higher than trail group[(18.67±8.12) min and (9.6±2.9) d]. Postoperative severe swelling and severe pain incidence rate in control group, were 68.00% and 64.00%, which were significantly higher than that of trail group(30.00% and 38.00% respectively). Total complications as spat injury incidence rate in control group was 72.00%, while it in trail group was 10%. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion: This paper demonstrates multiple clinical values of minimally invasive surgery in odontectomy of impacted mandibular wisdom teeth.

Key words: mandible third molar, extraction, impaction of low site, minimally invasive technology

摘要： 目的：探讨在拔除下颌低位埋伏阻生智齿的过程中采用微创技术的临床应用效果。方法：随机选取2014-06—2016-03间在我院就诊的下颌低位埋伏阻生牙拔除患者100例，其中分别包括微创技术拔除患者和传统凿骨劈冠拔除患者各50例，并分别将其纳入本次探究的实验组和对照组，比较和分析两组治疗的效果。结果：对照组患者的手术时间及术后恢复时间分别为（27.86±11.20） min、（15.3±3.70） d，手术时间及术后恢复所需时间均明显高于实验组的（18.67±8.12） min、（9.60±2.90） d；对照组患者术后重度肿胀及重度疼痛的发生率分别为68%和64%，显著高于实验组发生率（30%、38%）；对照组患者发生口角损伤等并发症的发生率合计为72%显著高于实验组（10%）。上述所有的组间差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论：微创手术可以缩短手术时间，降低手术创伤性，改善手术预后，临床应用效果显著。

关键词: 下颌第三磨牙； , , 拔除； , , 低位阻生； , , 微创

CLC Number:

R782.4

YAN Feng-ru, DING Yan. Minimally Invasive Technique in Odontectomy of Low Level Impacted Wisdom Teeth of the Mandible[J]. 《Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery》, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-4979.2017.06.006.

延凤茹，丁延. 微创技术在拔除下颌低位埋伏阻生牙中的应用[J]. 《口腔颌面外科杂志》, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-4979.2017.06.006.

/ / Recommend / Download Citations

URL: https://journal06.magtech.org.cn/Jweb_joms/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1005-4979.2017.06.006

https://journal06.magtech.org.cn/Jweb_joms/EN/Y2017/V27/I6/406

References

[1] 刘兴翠, 高玉萍, 鲁伟．下颌阻生智齿拔除术并发症原因分析[J]．口腔颌面外科杂志, 2011, 21(3):189-191．

[2] 秦瑞峰, 胡开进. 微创拔牙技术的应用[J]. 中国实用口腔科杂志, 2010, 3(10):592-596.

[3] 胡开进, 杨擎天. 微创拔牙理念及技术操作[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2011, 38(3):249-252，264.

[4] 胡开进. 微创拔牙技术[J]. 现代口腔医学杂志, 2010, 24(5):241-243.

[5] 林勇, 常显亭, 张建成, 等. 微创拔牙技术拔除下颌低位埋伏阻生智齿临床研究[J]. 中国实用口腔科杂志, 2014, 7(5):257-258.

[6] 汪湧, 徐颖, 杨驰．微创技术在牙及牙槽外科中的应用[J]．中国实用口腔科杂志， 2012， 5(8):459-465．

[7] 魏红, 漆昱君．微创拔牙新进展[J]．临床口腔医学杂志, 2014, 30(1):52-53．

[8] PAN SK, FANG M. The clinical application of minimally invasive increase gap pulling in the treatment of mandibular impacted wisdom teeth[J]. J Bengbu Med Coll, 2014, 39(7):918-919.

[9] 张志霞, 周宏志, 刘瑶, 等．微创拔牙术在下颌阻生智齿拔除中的应用[J]．实用口腔医学杂志, 2012, 28(3):398-400．

[10] 於丽明, 段世勇．微创拔牙技术的应用进展[J]．口腔颌面外科杂志, 2011, 21(1):65-67.

[11] 郭宏剑, 梁非照, 黎钢. 微创拔牙技术在下颌阻生智齿拔除中的应用进展[J]. 中国临床新医学, 2013, 6(6):601-602.

[12] 徐锦程, 赵莉莉, 王艳 , 等. 微创拔牙法与锤凿劈冠法在下颌低位阻生智齿拔除中的效果比较[J]. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2013, 4(38):395-396.

[13] 青松, 杨晶, 谭智, 等. 微创拔牙在下颌智齿拔出术中的应用[J]. 齐齐哈尔医学院学报, 2011, 32(22):3669-3670.

[14] 张志刚. 微创技术在拔除下颌低位埋伏阻生智齿中的应用[J]. 安徽医药, 2015, 19(4): 723-725.

[15] 平宇炳. 微创拔牙技术与传统凿骨劈冠法拔除下颌低位埋伏阻生智齿的临床效果对比[J]. 山西医药杂志, 2015, 44(9):1067-1068.

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export