《口腔颌面外科杂志》 ›› 2012, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (4): 252-256. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-4979.2012.04.006

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

浅静脉及深浅静脉回流对183例前臂皮瓣存活率的影响

石荣华,赵云富,刘渊,吴洋,黄建涛,陈潇卿   

  1. 第二军医大学附属长征医院口腔科,上海 200003
  • 出版日期:2012-08-28 发布日期:2012-11-01
  • 作者简介:石荣华(1981—),男,上海人,住院医师,硕士. E-mail: 1406671962@qq.com

Superficial Versus Deep Venous Drainage of the Radial Forearm Free Flaps

SHI Rong-hua, ZHAO Yun-fu,  LIU Yuan, WU Yang, HUANG Jian-tao, CHENG Xiao-qing   

  • Online:2012-08-28 Published:2012-11-01
  • About author:陈潇卿,住院医师.E-mail:gorillar1106@163.com 赵云富,主任医师.E-mail: zhaoyf1818@126.com

摘要:  目的:探讨使用游离桡侧前臂皮瓣进行颌面部缺损修复时,采用浅静脉回流与深、浅静脉回流对于皮瓣危象发生率、皮瓣存活率的影响。方法:选择1991?鄄01—2011-11完成的,183例采用游离桡侧前臂皮瓣(RFFF)修复口腔颌面部缺损的患者作为研究对象。按照皮瓣回流静脉分为2组:深浅静脉回流组(组Ⅰ,85例)、浅静脉回流组(组Ⅱ,98例)。分析肿瘤的部位和类型、皮瓣回流静脉的选择、皮瓣成活情况及皮瓣危象发生情况。结果:组Ⅰ中皮瓣危象的发生率(8/85)与组Ⅱ中皮瓣危象发生率(6/98)没有显著统计学差异(χ2检验,P=0.40)。 组Ⅱ中,吻合2条浅静脉和吻合1条浅静脉的病例,血管危象的发生率分别为2/27 和 4/71,但差异没有统计学意义(Fisher检验,P=0.67)。单静脉吻合与双静脉吻合的病例中,血管危象的发生率分别为4/71 和 10/112,但差异没有统计学意义(χ2检验,P=0.41)。术后组Ⅰ皮瓣存活率96.47%(82/85),组Ⅱ皮瓣存活率为100%(98/98),2组在存活率上没有显著差异(Fisher检验,P=0.0983),术后皮瓣的总成活率为98.36%(180/183)。结论:浅静脉回流在解剖上及技术上都是可靠的,单纯吻合一条浅静脉不影响皮瓣存活率。

关键词: 桡侧前臂皮瓣, 头静脉, 桡静脉, 静脉栓塞, 皮瓣危象

Abstract: Objective: This study aimed to investigate whether the failure rate of forearm free skin flap are related to venous drainage in locations at different levels within the flap.  Methods: 183 radial forearm free flaps for oral and maxillofacial surgical defect reconstruction from Jan 1991 to Nov 2011 were retrospectively analyzed and assigned to two groups. Group Ⅰ(n=85), superficial and deep both venous drainages were established in the flap. Group Ⅱ(n=98), only superficial venous drainage were anastomosed.  Analysis data including:the location and type of tumor, position of the drainage vein of free flap, the survival rate of free flap and incidence rate of flap compromises.  Results: No statistical differences in venous problems between group Ⅰ and group Ⅱ were performed(8/85 vs 6/98, Chi-Square Test, P=0.4). In group Ⅱ, cases with two superficial venous anastomoses showed a slight higher incidence of venous problems than  one superficial venous anastomosis cases,  but the difference was not significant (2/27 vs 4/71, Fisher's exact test, P=0.67). However, all cases with one venous anastomosis showed a slight lower incidence of venous problem than all cases with two venous anastomoses, and without significant difference(4/71 vs 10/112, Chi- Square Test, P=0.41). In the postoperative period, the flap survival rate in group Ⅰ was 96.47%(82/85), while it was 100%(98/98) in group Ⅱ,and without a significant difference(Fisher's exact test, P=0.0983). The total survival rate was 98.36%(180/183). Conclusion: Superficial venous drainage in radial forearm free flap is reliable both in anatomical and technical considerations. Only cephalic venous anastomosis could shorten the time of surgery.

Key words: radial forearm flap, cephalic vein, radial vein, flap compromise, venous thrombosis

中图分类号: