《口腔颌面外科杂志》 ›› 2026, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (3): 228-232. doi: 10.12439/kqhm.1005-4979.2026.03.008

• 临床总结 • 上一篇    下一篇

颌骨动静脉畸形和静脉畸形的临床及CT影像学特征比较

张文溪(), 文珊辉, 林梓桐()   

  1. 南京大学医学院附属口腔医院,南京市口腔医院口腔颌面医学影像科,南京大学口腔医学研究所,南京 210008
  • 收稿日期:2025-03-18 接受日期:2025-07-24 出版日期:2026-06-28 上线日期:2026-06-30
  • 通讯作者: 林梓桐,副教授. E-mail: linzitong710@163.com
  • 作者简介:
    张文溪,硕士研究生. E-mail:
  • 基金资助:
    南京市口腔医院高水平医院建设科研项目(0224C011); 南京大学医学院附属口腔医院学科带头人后备人才(0223A204)

Comparative analysis of clinical and CT imaging features of intraosseous arteriovenous malformations and venous malformations in the jaws

ZHANG Wenxi(), WEN Shanhui, LIN Zitong()   

  1. Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Nanjing Stomatological Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Institute of Stomatology, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, China
  • Received:2025-03-18 Accepted:2025-07-24 Published:2026-06-28 Online:2026-06-30

摘要:

目的:

比较颌骨动静脉畸形(arteriovenous malformations,AVMs)和颌骨静脉畸形(venous malformations,VMs)的临床表现及CT影像学特征。

方法:

回顾性分析2015年5月至2023年11月于我院确诊的10例颌骨血管畸形患者的病历资料,其中颌骨AVMs 4例 [经数字减影血管造影(digital subtraction angiography,DSA)或增强CT确诊],颌骨VMs 6例(经术后病理确诊)。收集患者年龄、性别、病变部位、出血史、疼痛史等临床资料;分析CT影像学特征,包括病变边缘情况、病变内部结构、骨皮质完整性、牙根吸收情况及下颌神经管异常表现。采用Fisher确切概率检验比较2组影像学特征差异,并评价不同影像学征象对颌骨AVMs的诊断效能。

结果:

4例颌骨AVMs均发生于下颌骨,其中2例有出血史;CT均表现为边缘不清晰、内部可见纤维样分隔的低密度病变,患侧下颌神经管均表现为管腔扩大。6例颌骨VMs中5例发生于下颌骨,均无出血史;CT主要表现为类圆形低密度病变,边缘可清晰或不清晰,其中2例出现下颌神经管受压移位。2组比较显示,下颌神经管异常及骨皮质完整性差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),其中下颌神经管异常对颌骨AVMs诊断的灵敏度和特异度均较高。

结论:

AVMs和VMs的CT影像学特征具有一定差异,临床上应注意鉴别诊断。

关键词: 颌骨, 动静脉畸形, 静脉畸形, 影像学特征

Abstract:

Objective:

To compare the clinical manifestations and CT imaging features of intraosseous arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) and intraosseous venous malformations (VMs) in the jaws.

Methods:

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 10 patients with intraosseous VMs of the jaws diagnosed in our hospital from May 2015 to November 2023, including 4 cases of jaw AVMs confirmed by digital subtraction angiography (DSA) or contrast-enhanced CT and 6 cases of jaw VMs confirmed by postoperative histopathology. Clinical data, including age, sex, lesion location, history of bleeding, and pain, were collected. CT imaging features, including lesion margin, internal structure, cortical bone integrity, tooth root resorption, and abnormalities of the mandibular canal, were analyzed. Fisher's exact test was used to compare imaging features between the two groups, and the diagnostic performance of different imaging features for identifying jaw AVMs was evaluated.

Results:

All 4 cases of jaw AVMs occurred in the mandible, and 2 patients had a history of bleeding. CT images showed ill-defined hypodense lesions with internal fibrous septa, and all mandibular canals on the affected side were enlarged. Among the 6 cases of jaw VMs, 5 occurred in the mandible, and none had a history of bleeding. CT images mainly showed round or oval hypodense lesions with either well-defined or ill-defined margins, and displacement of the mandibular canal was observed in 2 cases. Significant differences were found between the two groups in abnormalities of the mandibular canal and cortical bone integrity (P<0.05). Abnormalities of the mandibular canal demonstrated relatively high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of jaw AVMs.

Conclusion:

CT imaging features differ between jaw AVMs and VMs, warranting careful clinical differentiation.

Key words: jaw bone, arteriovenous malformations, venous malformations, imaging features