应用超声骨刀拔除下颌第三磨牙临床效果的Meta分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-4979.2019.04.007

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的：采用 Meta 分析评价应用超声骨刀拔除下颌第三磨牙的临床效果。方法：计算机检索CBM、CNKI、VIP 数据库和万方数据库，同时对检索结果的参考文献进行检索，检索时间为建库至2019-03-01，搜集应用超声骨刀与单纯涡轮钻法拔除下颌阻生第三磨牙临床效果的随机对照试验文献，对检索结果进行独立质量评估和数据提取，采用RevMan 5.3软件进行Meta分析。结果：9篇文献纳入研究分析，包括实验组534 例，对照组529例。Meta分析表明应用或者联合应用超声骨刀与单纯涡轮钻法拔除下颌阻生第三磨牙相比，手术时间缩短（P<0.01），术后疼痛程度减轻（P<0.01），肿胀和张口受限的发生率降低（P<0.01）。结论：应用或联合应用超声骨刀法拔除下颌阻生第三磨牙的临床效果优于单纯涡轮钻方法。

关键词: 超声骨刀, 下颌第三磨牙, Meta分析

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the clinical effect of extraction of the mandibular third molar using piezosurgery. Methods: The database of CBM, CNKI, VIP, and Wanfang were searched up to March 1st, 2019. Literatures of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the clinical effects of piezosurgery and rotary instruments in extracting mandibular impacted teeth were collected. After data extraction and quality evaluation, a meta-analysis was carried out with Revman 5.3 software. Results: 9 clinical research papers were selected to analyse, including 534 cases in experimental group and 529 cases in control group. Compared with using rotary instruments, the operation time of tooth extraction was shorter (P<0.01), using or combining with piezosurgery, with lower scores of postoperative pain(P<0.01), and the lower incidence of complications such as facial swelling and limited mouth opening(P<0.01). Conclusion: Mandibular impacted third molar extraction using or combining with piezosurgery is clinically superior to using rotary instruments alone.

Key words: piezosurgery, mandibular third molar, meta-analysis

中图分类号:

R782

陈洪涛1，曲晓复2，李明恒1，贺平1，李冀寅1. 应用超声骨刀拔除下颌第三磨牙临床效果的Meta分析[J]. 《口腔颌面外科杂志》, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-4979.2019.04.007.

CHEN Hong-tao1, QU Xiao-fu2, LI Ming-heng1, HE Ping1, LI Ji-yin1. The Clinical Effect of Mandibular Third Molar Extraction with Piezosurgery: a Meta-analysis[J]. 《Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery》, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-4979.2019.04.007.

https://journal06.magtech.org.cn/Jweb_joms/CN/Y2019/V29/I4/218

参考文献

[1] Ge J, Yang C, Zheng JW, et al. Four osteotomy methods with piezosurgery to remove complicated mandibular third molars: a retrospective study[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2014, 72(11):2126-2133.

[2] Pavlíkov?觃 G, Folt?觃n R, Hork?觃 M, et al. Piezosurgery in oral and maxillofacial surgery[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2010, 40(5):451-457.

[3] Higgins JP, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011) [M]. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons Ltd, 2011.

[4] 罗杰. 系统评价/Meta分析理论与实践[M]. 北京: 军事医学科学出版社, 2013: 97-117.

[5] 刘朝阳, 唐璟, 唐祎, 等. 超声骨刀联合45°反角涡轮钻拔除下颌复杂阻生智齿的临床疗效观察[J]. 临床口腔医学杂志, 2018, 34(8):495-498.

[6] 吴昌敬, 邵军, 蔡剑林, 等. 超声骨刀联合高速涡轮机拔除下颌埋伏第三磨牙的临床应用[J]. 口腔颌面外科杂志, 2016(1):38-41.

[7] 崔言军, 刘昕, 徐宝军. 两种微动力系统在下颌阻生牙拔除中的临床效果比较[J]. 全科口腔医学电子杂志, 2018, 5(33):79-81.

[8] 张华萍, 薛雪惠. 超声骨刀拔除下颌水平位阻生牙的效果观察和临床护理[J]. 中国医药指南, 2017, 15(31):227-228.

[9] 吴妹娟, 李张维, 吴丹妮, 等. 超声骨刀拔除牙科焦虑症患者阻生齿的应用与护理[J]. 护理实践与研究, 2017, 14(6):68-70.

[10] 吴带生, 陈俊兰, 彭伟, 等. 超声骨刀和涡轮手机在复杂下颌阻生智齿拔除中的临床应用[J]. 中国医学创新, 2017, 14(24):10-13.

[11] 许龙, 杜学锋. 超声骨刀结合高速涡轮机拔除下颌低位水平阻生智齿的效果[J]. 全科口腔医学电子杂志, 2017, 4(8):38-39.

[12] 吴昌敬, 邵军, 蔡剑林, 等. 超声骨刀联合高速涡轮机拔除下颌埋伏第三磨牙的临床应用[J]. 口腔颌面外科杂志, 2016, 26(1):38-41.

[13] 王海鑫. 应用超声骨刀配合高速涡轮手机拔除患者下颌低位水平阻生智齿的临床研究[J]. 中国民康医学, 2016, 28(3):24-26.

[14] 刘瑶, 王玲, 杨维虹, 等. Hall技术治疗乳磨牙龋坏疗效的系统评价[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2018, 34(10):1076-1080.

[15] Cassetta M, Altieri F. The influence of mandibular third molar germectomy on the treatment time of of impacted mandibular second molars using brass wire:a prospective clinical pilot study[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2017, 46 (7):905-911.

[16] Rullo R, Addabbo F, Papaccio G, et al. Piezoelectric device vs.conventional rotative instruments in impacted third molar surgery:relationships between surgical difficulty and postoperative pain with histological evaluations[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2013, 41(2):e33-e38.

[17] 赵吉宏, 黄从发. 现代牙槽外科新技术[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2016.

[18] 陈旭锋, 陈铁, 赖仁发. 超声骨刀在种植外科中的应用进展[J]. 中华老年口腔医学杂志, 2015, 13(1):44-46.

[19] Barone A, Santini S, Marconcini S, et al. Osteotomy and membrane elevation during the maxillary sinus augmentation procedure. a comparative study: piezoelectric device vs conventional rotative instruments[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2008,19(5):511-515.

[20] Bovi M, Manni A, Mavriqi L, et al. The use of piezosurgery to mobilize the mandibular alveolar nerve followed immediately by implant insertion: a case series evaluating neurosensory disturbance[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2010, 30(1): 73-81.

[21] Robiony M, Polini F, Costa F, et al. Piezoelectric bone cutting in multipiece maxillary osteotomies[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2004, 62 (6):759-761.

[22] Eggers G, Klein J, Blank J, et al. Piezosurgery:an ultrasound device for cutting bone and its use and limitations in maxillofacial surgery[J]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2004, 42(5):451-453.

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容