CBCT相关影像学参数对下牙槽神经损伤风险的评估

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-4979.2017.06.004

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的：研究CBCT相关影像学参数用于评估第三磨牙拔除术后下牙槽神经损伤风险的准确性。方法：选取在我科拔除的105颗第三磨牙的影像学资料，测量第三磨牙的Pell-Gregory分类（等级和位置）、水平夹角和距离（牙根-下牙槽神经），分析等级（Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ级）、位置（A为高位，B为中位，C为低位）及水平夹角等参数与距离间的关系，从而评价CBCT相关影像学参数用于评估第三磨牙拔除术后下牙槽神经损伤风险的准确性。结果：①Ⅰ等级-A位、Ⅲ等级-C位的相关性较大；②Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅰ+Ⅱ等级相较于Ⅲ等级，其距离（牙根-下牙槽神经）差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）；③水平夹角＞5°和≤5°的第三磨牙，其距离差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）；④水平夹角≤5°的Ⅰ+Ⅱ等级第三磨牙相较于水平夹角＞5°的Ⅰ+Ⅱ等级第三磨牙，其距离差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）；⑤水平夹角＞5°的Ⅲ等级第三磨牙相较于水平夹角＞5°的Ⅰ+Ⅱ等级第三磨牙，其距离差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论：两种CBCT相关影像学参数（等级参数和水平夹角参数）均可单独用于下牙槽神经损伤风险的评估，同时运用这两种参数，可以提高风险评估的准确性。

关键词: , 第三磨牙； , , Pell-Gregory分类； , , 水平夹角； , , 锥形束CT； , , 下牙槽神经

Abstract: Objective: To investigate the accuracy of three-dimensional imaging parameters in assessing the risk of lower alveolar nerve injuries at third molar surgery. Methods: 3-dimensional imaging parameters of 105 wisdom teeth were enrolled in this review. Pell-Gregory classification and measurement of wisdom teeth (rank and position), horizontal angle and distance (root-inferior alveolar nerve) were performed. The relationship between grade(Ⅰ,Ⅱ,Ⅲ), location(A means impaction of high site, B means median impaction, C means impaction of low site)， horizontal angle and distance between the parameters were analyzed. The assessment of risks of inferior alveolar nerve injuries were also performed. Results: ① The correlation between grade I and A was greater. The correlation between grade Ⅲ and C was greater. ② The grade of Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅰ+Ⅱ is higher than grade Ⅲ. There was a statistically difference in distance(root inferior alveolar nerve) (P<0.05). ③ Horizontal angle (>5° and ≤5°) of the teeth, there was a significant difference in the distance (P<0.05). ④ Ⅰ+Ⅱ grade teeth horizontal angle ≤5° compared to the horizontal angle ＞5°, there was a significant difference in the distance (P<0.05). ⑤ There was significant statistical difference in the distance between the third grade wisdom teeth of horizontal angle >5° and the level of angle >5° (P<0.05). Conclusions: Two kinds of 3-dimensional image parameters (grade parameter and horizontal angle parameter) can be used to evaluate the risk of lower alveolar nerve injury alone, but the clinical accuracy of risk assessment can be improved by using these two parameters simultaneously.

Key words: third molar, Pell-Gregory classification, horizontal angle, cone beam CT, inferior alveolar nerve

中图分类号:

R782.4

杨岚1，乐晶惊1，宋鑫磊2. CBCT相关影像学参数对下牙槽神经损伤风险的评估[J]. 《口腔颌面外科杂志》, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-4979.2017.06.004.

YANG Lan1, LE Jing-jing1, SONG Xin-lei2. Appitcation of Dimensional Imaging Parameters of CBCT in the Assessment of Risks of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Injuries[J]. 《Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery》, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-4979.2017.06.004.

https://journal06.magtech.org.cn/Jweb_joms/CN/Y2017/V27/I6/395

参考文献

[1] Cheung L K, Leung Y Y, Chow L K, et al. Incidence of neurosensory deficits and recovery after lower third molar surgery: a prospective clinical study of 4338 cases[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2010, 39(4):320-326.

[2] Ueda M, Nakamori K, Shiratori K, et al. Clinical significance of computed tomographic assessment and anatomic features of the inferior alveolar canal as risk factors for injury of the inferior alveolar nerve at third molar surgery[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2012, 70(3):514-520.

[3] Susarla S M, Dodson T B. How well do clinicians estimate third molar extraction difficulty[J]? J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2005, 63(2):191-199.

[4] Wahl J P. Impacted Mandibular Third Molars[J]. J Am Dent Assoc, 1930, 17(3):490-496.

[5] Kim J W, Cha I H, Kim S J, et al. Which risk factors are associated with neurosensory deficits of inferior alveolar nerve after mandibular third molar extraction[J]? J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2012, 70(11):2508-2514.

[6] Eyrich G, Seifert B, Matthews F, et al. 3-Dimensional imaging for lower third molars: is there an implication for surgical removal[J]? JOral Maxillofac Surg, 2011, 69(7):1867-1872.

[7] Beaty N B, Le T T. Mandibular thickness measurements in young dentate adults[J]. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2009, 135(9):920-923.

[8] Kwon K H, Sim K B, Lee J M. Evaluation of the course of the inferior alveolar canal in the mandibular ramus using cone beam computed tomography[J]. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2012, 38(4):231-239.

[9] Rood JP , Shehab BA. The radiological prediction of inferior alveolar nerve injury during third molar surgery[J]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1990, 28(1):20-25.

[10] 华成舸. 微创拔牙的刚体力学分析[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2017, 35(2):119-123.

[11] 杨映阳, 杜胜男, 吕宗凯. 高速涡轮机头和微创拔牙刀在下颌阻生牙拔除术中的应用效果评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2015, 24(4):489-492.

[12] 罗怡. 下颌第三磨牙正畸牵引拔除的护理进展[J]. 上海护理, 2014, 14(7).

[1]	张雨菡，韩雯斐，孟博，苏俭生，肖凡. 调控小鼠腮腺分泌中枢神经系统相关核团的分布[J]. 《口腔颌面外科杂志》, 2019, 29(3): 121-.
[2]	马旭辉，王丽珍，任国欣，吴云腾，顾挺，郭伟. SOX10作为原发性口腔黏膜恶性黑色素瘤分子诊断指标的初步研究[J]. 《口腔颌面外科杂志》, 2019, 29(3): 131-.
[3]	范德生，甄蕾，汪黎明. miRNA-31对糖尿病小鼠来源骨髓间充质干细胞体外成骨分化的影响[J]. 《口腔颌面外科杂志》, 2019, 29(3): 137-.
[4]	郭泽鸿，周磊，徐淑兰，丁祥龙，赵春萍, 卢灿. 改良式骨劈开术水平骨增量对软硬组织的影响[J]. 《口腔颌面外科杂志》, 2019, 29(3): 142-.
[5]	张庆福，牛璐，符国才，聂恒金，吕春堂. 中段桥接式钛合金全下颌骨植入体的设计制作研究[J]. 《口腔颌面外科杂志》, 2019, 29(3): 148-.
[6]	吴东，林兆楠，林彦君，周麟，游冬冬，黄文秀，陈永辉. 自体牙来源骨移植材料在口腔种植中应用的短期临床观察[J]. 《口腔颌面外科杂志》, 2019, 29(3): 152-.
[7]	冯海楠，王淼，常晓峰，杜良智，周慧霞，李晓红，刘少丽，贺龙龙. 上颌窦底提升术后种植修复的十年临床回顾分析[J]. 《口腔颌面外科杂志》, 2019, 29(3): 159-.
[8]	施雄，李生娇，周剑萍，张利，李百龙. 锥形束CT在牙内陷诊断中的应用[J]. 《口腔颌面外科杂志》, 2019, 29(3): 164-.
[9]	岳广娜，王佐林. 石墨烯家族生物相容性的研究进展[J]. 《口腔颌面外科杂志》, 2019, 29(3): 169-.
[10]	孙睿男，王佐林. 单细胞转录组测序技术进展及其在间充质干细胞研究中的应用#br#[J]. 《口腔颌面外科杂志》, 2019, 29(3): 174-.
[11]	李宏权1，宋扬1，李志耀1，吴玉波1，钱文昊1，周曾同2. 丹酚酸B及其磷脂复合纳米粒抑制口腔鳞癌和白斑细胞株的作用[J]. 《口腔颌面外科杂志》, 2018, 28(6): 314-321.
[12]	王佐林，王方. 创新发展，求同存异 ——“争鸣与共识”种植论坛（第四季）学术共识[J]. 《口腔颌面外科杂志》, 2018, 28(2): 61-.
[13]	万会璇，蔡明详，孙瑶. 局部激活破骨细胞对大鼠应用双膦酸盐后拔牙创愈合的影响[J]. 《口腔颌面外科杂志》, 2018, 28(2): 65-.
[14]	李威，杨旭东，王志勇，卢晓林，王洋，王育新. 数字化技术辅助颌骨截骨及颌面修复的临床应用[J]. 《口腔颌面外科杂志》, 2018, 28(2): 75-.
[15]	刘弦1，易杰2，胡小华2，姚礼2，张霓霓2，黄桂林2. 前哨淋巴结冰冻切片在口腔癌颈淋巴结清扫术的应用研究[J]. 《口腔颌面外科杂志》, 2018, 28(2): 80-.

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容