《口腔颌面外科杂志》 ›› 2025, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2): 149-152. doi: 10.12439/kqhm.1005-4979.2025.02.011

• 综述 • 上一篇    下一篇

牙槽嵴保存技术研究进展

张秀静1(), 王妙贞2, 田洪琰2, 刘星2, 刘峰2()   

  1. 1 黑龙江省牡丹江市口腔医院全科,牡丹江 157000
    2 北京大学口腔医院门诊部,北京口腔医院门诊部综合科,北京 100120
  • 收稿日期:2023-08-31 接受日期:2024-02-19 出版日期:2025-04-28 上线日期:2025-04-28
  • 通讯作者: 刘峰,主任医师. E-mail:dentistliufeng@126.com
  • 作者简介:
    张秀静,硕士研究生. E-mail:

Research progress of alveolar ridge preservation

ZHANG Xiujing1(), WANG Miaozhen2, TIAN Hongyan2, LIU Xing2, LIU Feng2()   

  1. 1 General Department of Mudanjiang Stomatological Hospital in Heilongjiang Province, Mudanjiang 157000
    2 Outpatient Department of Peking University Stomatological Hospital, Comprehensive Department of Outpatient Department of Beijing Stomatological Hospital, Beijing 100120, China
  • Received:2023-08-31 Accepted:2024-02-19 Published:2025-04-28 Online:2025-04-28

摘要:

牙槽嵴保存技术(alveolar ridge preservation,ARP)可阻断或减缓牙槽骨吸收,实现剩余牙槽嵴的保存或增量,降低种植位点植骨的比例和治疗难度。尽管ARP是一种有效减少骨吸收的方法,但在手术方法、时机等方面仍存在争议。本文将对近年来ARP的材料选择与临床程序、临床疗效、影响预后的因素、治疗决策树和术后并发症进行综述。

关键词: 牙槽嵴保存技术, 骨丧失, 种植体

Abstract:

Alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) could reduce the amount of required bone graft and the complexity of the augmentation procedure during the consequent implant placement. Although ARP is an effective way to reduce bone resorption, there is still controversy about the surgical method and timing of surgery. This article systematically reviewed ARP procedure in terms of material selection, clinical procedure, clinical efficacy, prognostic factors, treatment decision trees, and postoperative complications.

Key words: alveolar ridge preservation, alveolar bone loss, implant

中图分类号: